Hi there,
Submitted bug report 214602 along with a patch for an update to ieee80211(9) page. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214602 ----- Original Message ----- From: Benjamin Kaduk <ka...@mit.edu> To: Fehmi Noyan ISI <fnoyan...@yahoo.com> Cc: "freebsd-doc@freebsd.org" <freebsd-doc@freebsd.org> Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2016 3:42 AM Subject: Re: Updating the ieee80211(9) manual page On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 03:49:33AM +0000, Fehmi Noyan ISI wrote: > Thanks Benjamin, > > Both NetBSD [1] and FreeBSD [2] versions of ieee80211.9 manual pages have > been licensed with a 2-cluase BSD license by their respective authors. > > > If I update the FreeBSD ieee80211(9) man page with the information from > ieee80211(9) man page from NetBSD, what should the license look like? > > Would something similar to one given below be OK? > > > .\" Copyright (c) 2004 Bruce M. Simpson <b...@spc.org> > .\" Copyright (c) 2004 Darron Broad <dar...@kewl.org> > .\" Copyright (c) 2009 Sam Leffler, Errno Consulting > .\" All rights reserved. > ... rest of the license comes here Yes, that's the right thing to do. > Also, in the HISTORY part, is it worth mentioning that the (FreeBSD) manual > page was updated with the information from NetBSD IEEE80211 man page? I would not insist on it if a submission appeared that did not include such a mention, but it is better to have it present than absent. -Ben _______________________________________________ freebsd-doc@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-doc-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
