On Wed, 20 Aug 2014, Warren Block wrote:

On Wed, 20 Aug 2014, John Baldwin wrote:

On Tuesday, August 19, 2014 6:01:54 pm Warren Block wrote:
On Mon, 4 Aug 2014, Warren Block wrote:

Draft version of an ezjail section for the Handbook Jails chapter:
http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/jails/jails-ezjail.html

This includes a complete setup at the end for running BIND in a jail.
In addition to a complete jail example, it can also serve as an example of
how to set up BIND now that the old chroot configuration is no more.

Asking for review again of the final version at the link above.  If
there are no major complaints in the next few days, it will be
committed.

It's not clear to me if you need lo1? If you are using aliases on an external interface as you would with a traditional jail then I think you don't need the
lo1 interface?

It's there to keep jails from being involved with lo0 on the host. But I admit the explanation is fuzzy, and will seek clarification.

Updated.  It now says:

  To keep jail loopback traffic off the host's loopback network
  interface lo0, a second loopback interface is created by adding
  an entry to /etc/rc.conf:...
_______________________________________________
freebsd-doc@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-doc-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to