On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 05:38:11PM -0700, Warren Block wrote: > I would like to be more specific in this part: > > Quite often, a specific implementation is required, like GNU make, or > legacy FreeBSD make. > > I think that should say: > > Quite often, a specific implementation is required, like GNU make > (gmake), or legacy FreeBSD make (fmake). > > Is that correct?
For FreeBSD, technically yes, it is correct; however, in GNU/Linux distros GNU make is installed just as "make" (no `g' prefix). That said, if you want to be even more accurate, you could say: Quite often, a specific implementation is required, like GNU make (known in &os; as <command>gmake</command>), or legacy &os; make (<command>fmake</command>). ./danfe _______________________________________________ freebsd-doc@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-doc-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
