On 2013-11-24 17:46, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> Warren Block wrote this message on Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 07:21 -0700:
>> On Sat, 23 Nov 2013, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
>>
>>> Attached is a patch that bring this up to date..  This was written back
>>> when we were using UFS1 w/ 32bit block addresses...  Things have changes
>>> now that UFS2 is standard...
>>>
>>> The big thing is listing the memory requirements for fsck as the main
>>> limiting factor on FS size...
>>>
>>> I've had Kirk review the patch, and he's fine w/ it...
>>>
>>> Shall I just commit it?
>> fsck should be either &man.fsck.8; or <command>fsck</command>, depending 
>> on context.
>>
>> There is a duplicated "the" in the first paragraph.  igor -Rz should be 
>> run on the patched file.
> This is a single reply, thanks to the three of you for reviewing the
> patch.. it's now committed in r43236..
>
> Oh, I did change a such as to e.g., and in doing so, I noticed an e.g.
> w/o the trailing period...  wondering if we should be consistent and
> add it?
>
You broke the doc build. Seems you're missing the ; after your manpage
entity

-- 
Allan Jude


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to