https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=285253
--- Comment #19 from Gleb Popov <arr...@freebsd.org> --- (In reply to Martin Birgmeier from comment #17) > I ran release/release.sh to build the necessary tarballs for poudriere. That sounds wrong. You can create a poudriere jail from host's /usr/src and /usr/obj, which is a preferred method when you want STABLE. You could also just use the ftp method to install the latest FreeBSD 14 release and it would also work just fine, since FreeBSD is backwards compatible. Well, unless you have some custom patches applied on top of your stable branch. > As far as I could find out, this setup does not fit well with what poudriere > requires, which is basically a single machine with lots of cores and lots of > ZFS disk space. However, this impression may be wrong due to me not knowing > poudriere well enough. You can set NO_ZFS=yes in poudriere.conf and then just mount your network storage into /usr/local/poudriere/... But yeah, this is pretty non-canonical. > Ultimately and unsurprisingly, my 48 GB RAM disk ran full, at which point I > stopped the experiment. Poudriere uses tmpfs under the hood automatically. See grep TMPFS /usr/local/etc/poudriere.conf > My impression is that poudriere is an amazing piece of software which could > benefit of being updated to be more cloud-compatible. Yes, support for distributed building would be great. But maybe this should be solved at the compiler level with tools like distcc, I don't know. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
