https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=270835
--- Comment #9 from Jason W. Bacon <j...@freebsd.org> --- What drawback is there to making consolekit2 a requirement? >From my perspective, it's a small dependency that enables features in SDDM that most users want, and is already a requirement for many desktop environments and other display managers. FreeBSD coral.acadix bacon ~ 1004: port-grep consolekit2 -l /usr/ports/audio/pulseaudio/Makefile /usr/ports/deskutils/elementary-calendar/Makefile /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/packagekit/Makefile /usr/ports/security/plasma5-kscreenlocker/Makefile /usr/ports/sysutils/seatd/Makefile /usr/ports/www/gnome-user-share/Makefile /usr/ports/x11-wm/lxsession/Makefile /usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce4-session/Makefile /usr/ports/x11/cinnamon-session/Makefile /usr/ports/x11/gdm/Makefile /usr/ports/x11/gnome-session/Makefile /usr/ports/x11/lightdm/Makefile /usr/ports/x11/mate-session-manager/Makefile /usr/ports/x11/budgie-desktop/Makefile /usr/ports/x11/plasma5-plasma-workspace/Makefile /usr/ports/x11/slim/Makefile If anyone complains because they really doesn't want it, it could be made an option, or better yet we could provide package builds with and without. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
