On 7 April 2010 23:49, John Baldwin <j...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Tuesday 06 April 2010 11:24:21 am Nathan Whitehorn wrote: >> pluknet wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > the interesting part for me is how to properly assert now a value of e.g. >> > KINFO_PROC_SIZE varying on err.. different COMPAT_FREEBSD32 arches >> > (say, FreeBSD would have _kern_proc FreeBSD32 compat layer for top/ps/). >> > >> > >> Probably the cleanest thing would be to set KINFO_PROC_SIZE in >> machine/proc.h instead of where it is now, and then also define a >> KINFO_PROC32_SIZE or something in the same place. Also, that would be a >> really nice feature. > > Yes, I think this sounds like the best approach. >
Something quick & not clean (well, it passes universe) attached. So, don't shoot me, please ;-). It's unclear how to convert those mips o32/n32/o64/n64 though. I had to make definitions out of _KERNEL visibility as far as <sys/proc.h> is included from <sys/user.h> in !_KERNEL only too. -- wbr, pluknet
KINFO_PROC_SIZE_md.diff
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
