On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, Eir Nym wrote:
All is good in BIND in system, except it depends on ports tree with
various options.
I have to do followed algorithm, to enable these options:
1) make and install base system
2) install needed dependencies from ports tree
There is another step here, enable optional dependencies that are not
enabled by default.
3) rebuild and reinstall world
This is more complex than:
1) make and install base system
2) install same(?) BIND from ports tree with same options
So do that. :) Nothing requires you to use the optional mechanism in the
base.
Why does base system has any dependencies from ports?
I know about application features, but special cases aren't special
enough to break the rules, isn't it?
You haven't actually expressed a problem here. Can you enumerate any
actual concerns you have, and what the implications of them are?
FWIW, I added the options that exist now in response to user demand.
People wanted to be able to use BIND in the base with those options
enabled.
hth,
Doug
--
Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
-- Pablo Picasso
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
