On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 14:10:43 +0300, Alex Keda <[email protected]> wrote: > On 05.03.2010 13:59, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> In message<[email protected]>, Alex Keda writes: >> >> >>> then can a more correct name of the project or ClosedBSD or ManagedBSD? >>> =) >>> or something abstract? >>> >> You are free to use any other operating system of your choice, if you >> are not happy with FreeBSD. >> >> Don't let the door hit you on the way out. >> > I'm not going anywhere, not even hope for it =) > I'm trying to make FreeBSD a better, more logical. > Maybe that's not very successful, but judging by the number of > responses, it hurt many, and made to think even more people.
I think you misunderstand. Some of us old-timers have been having this discussion repeatedly for well over ten years. It always ends up the same way - a re-org might make the source tree marginally prettier but the consequences for long-term maintenance and supporting downstream contributors outweigh any possible benefit. Having the same conversation every two years with the same outcome gets annoying. > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]" _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
