M. Warner Losh writes: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I'm just saying that most of the developers I'm talking to on IRC say > this tread is insane, has no content and they are blowing it off > because of that. A concrete, real benchmark will go a long way > towards changing that. Until then, you are as good as kill filed.
How about Gordon's initial bootstone, which increased by 25%? http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16091.44150.539095.704531 And I just did a "make clean" run in /usr/ports/archivers (by manually mv'ing a static and dynamic sh to /bin in turn): static: 96.63 real 53.45 user 39.27 sys dynamic: 112.42 real 55.51 user 51.62 sys The wall clock is bad (16% worse) and the system time is worse (31%). So.. 1) Microbenchmark: 40% worse 2) Bootstone(*): 25% worse 3) Ports: 16% worse Drew _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
