On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 06:54:04PM -0700, Will Andrews wrote: > On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 09:45:27PM -0400, Barney Wolff wrote: > > I'm finally motivated to ask, why don't security advisories contain > > the equivalent revs for -head? Surely I can't be the only person > > following -current who doesn't build every day. > > Simply because the SO does not support -CURRENT.
Does this mean that the situation can ever arise where a security bug is corrected in the advisory's announced releases but not in -current? Or, can we assume that as of the time of the security announcement the vulnerability has *always* been corrected in -current? Thanks, Barney -- Barney Wolff http://www.databus.com/bwresume.pdf I'm available by contract or FT, in the NYC metro area or via the 'Net. _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
