On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Doug Barton wrote: > On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, John Birrell wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 01:25:09AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > > > I am a little confused about one thing though. What is going to > > > happen to third party apps that use -pthread that aren't compiled > > > through the ports? > > > > They need to replace -pthread with their thread library of choice > > (e.g. -lc_r or -lpthread). > > Errrr... I'm not sure this is an optimal solution. There is an awful > lot of software out there which expects -pthread to "just work." > Wouldn't it make more sense to default it to one thing or the other, > then make it configurable (isn't this what libmap.conf is supposed to > help with)?
We've already been over this before. The problem is not as bad as you think, and there are other platforms that don't have -pthread. -- Dan Eischen _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
