In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Tim Kientzle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: John Birrell wrote:
: > On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 08:06:25PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: >>At the very least, we should put [-pthread] back as a noop. The timing on
: >>this really sucks because it breaks the ports tree for an extended
: >>period of time. While the fixes are simple, they haven't been made
: >>yet. The fact that the tree is frozen makes it seem like a really bad
: >>time to make the change.
: >
: >
: > Yes, I think it should go back as a noop (mostly to satisfy the GCC
: > people though).
:
: Perhaps put it back as a noop with a particularly
: loud warning:
:
: "Warning: -pthread does nothing. If this is a port, complain to the
: maintainer to fix it."
Maybe we should just stick to the plan that Kris and Daniel worked
out?
Warner
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
