I usualy have a number of swap partitions since the max size of a swap partition is kind of limited. I was thinking of changing it to do swapon twice. The first time early in the boot would skip mounting any swap areas that had kernel core dumps. Then after the savecore it could do swapon again to mount the rest of the swap areas. Either that or have swaping start to allocate space at the oposite end of the swap space than savecore uses. _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
- swapon vs savecore dilemma Doug White
- Re: swapon vs savecore dilemma Scott Long
- Re: swapon vs savecore dilemma Pawel Worach
- Re: swapon vs savecore dilemma Terry Lambert
- Re: swapon vs savecore dilemma Bakul Shah
- Re: swapon vs savecore dilemma Terry Lambert
- Re: swapon vs savecore dilemma Terry Lambert
- Re: swapon vs savecore dilemma Aaron Wohl
- Re: swapon vs savecore dilemma Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: swapon vs savecore dilemma Doug Barton
- Re: swapon vs savecore dilemma Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: swapon vs savecore dilemma Doug Barton
- Re: swapon vs savecore dilemma Scott Long
- Re: swapon vs savecore dilemma Matthew D. Fuller
- Re: swapon vs savecore dil... Doug Barton
- Re: swapon vs savecore dilemma Doug Barton