It seems Bill Paul wrote:
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "M. Warner Losh" writes:
> > >Here's a better patch, basesd on wpaul's input. Bill, can you try it
> > >an see if it works for you? If so, i would be better to commit this
> > >one. If not, I'll work with you to fix it.
> >
> > FYI, I have a no-name ("PCMCIA"/"CD-ROM") drive that also requires
> > failure of the second IO range to be made non-fatal. How about just
> > deleting the `else' clause as in the patch below? It seems that
> > this can only affect CD-ROM drives that were otherwise not working,
> > so it should be fairly safe.
>
> This patch also tests good with my drive.
Thats what I proposed on the unnamed IRC channel yesterday, its fine by
me as well, can we agree to commit just this then ?
> > Index: ata-card.c
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /dump/FreeBSD-CVS/src/sys/dev/ata/ata-card.c,v
> > retrieving revision 1.14
> > diff -u -r1.14 ata-card.c
> > --- ata-card.c 17 Jun 2003 12:33:53 -0000 1.14
> > +++ ata-card.c 26 Jun 2003 23:00:01 -0000
> > @@ -131,10 +131,6 @@
> > start + ATA_ALTOFFSET, ATA_ALTIOSIZE);
> > }
> > }
> > - else {
> > - bus_release_resource(dev, SYS_RES_IOPORT, rid, io);
> > - return ENXIO;
> > - }
> >
> > /* allocate the altport range */
> > rid = ATA_ALTADDR_RID;
-Søren
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
