On Mon, 2003/06/09 at 16:58:38 -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've recently started work on making FreeBSD work better on a sparc64
> box that a friend has. It's a Netra AX1105-500 (UltraSPARC-IIe 500MHz).
>
> So far I have found out that the pci bus numbering has problems. We
> don't attach pci busses as they are numbered in the bridge/OFW info.
> This causes problems with pciconf -l and pciconf -{w,r} not agreeing.
> It isn't too hard to tie down the busses to make pciconf agree with
> itself.
>
> [...]
>
> Index: apb.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/sparc64/pci/apb.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.4
> diff -u -r1.4 apb.c
> --- apb.c 2002/03/24 02:10:56 1.4
> +++ apb.c 2003/06/09 23:33:07
> @@ -207,9 +207,11 @@
> * number, we should pick a better value. One sensible alternative
> * would be to pick 255; the only tradeoff here is that configuration
> * transactions would be more widely routed than absolutely necessary.
> + *
> + * If we don't hardware the bus down, pciconf gets confused.
> */
> if (sc->secbus != 0) {
> - child = device_add_child(dev, "pci", -1);
> + child = device_add_child(dev, "pci", sc->secbus);
> if (child != NULL)
> return (bus_generic_attach(dev));
> } else
This one looks good, please commit. The comment above is outdated, so
it might be better to just remove it completely.
- Thomas
--
Thomas Moestl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0015675/
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://people.FreeBSD.org/~tmm/
PGP fingerprint: 1C97 A604 2BD0 E492 51D0 9C0F 1FE6 4F1D 419C 776C
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
