Hiten Pandya wrote: > My fingers have been itching to do this since the day phk@ planted this > idea in my brain (re: cdevsw initialisations). Basically, it changes > the vfsops to use C99 sparse format, just like cdevsw. It removes a lot > of junk default initialisations, and duplication.
I really dislike the changes to vfs_init(). Specifically, it's not the overhead, so much as it's the implied side effects. Consider this going forward: someone adds a new VFSOP to the list of allowable VFSOPs, and the vfs_init() doesn't have any specific code for it. This could happen with a new VFS implementation that gets loaded as a module. While the current code can't really handle this well, the changes move us further away from ever being able to handle something like this. 8-(. -- Terry _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
