Jun Su wrote: > [ ... 1:1 kernel threads implementation ... ] > > A benchmark would be interested.
This request doesn't make sense. The primary performance reasoning behind a 1:1 kernel threading implementation, relative to the user space single kernel entry scheduler in the libc_r implementation is SMP scalability for threaded applications. Basically, the only reasonable benchmark, given this, for a comparison of the two would be a threaded CPU-bound program on a *non-SMP* system. That really makes no sense, because that wasn't the use case for the design goal of SMP scalability; it doesn't really matter *what* the relative performance is on UP systems, relative to the libc_r library, so long as it adds SMP scalability. Which it does. It's apples and oranges; there's really no reasonable way to compare the two implementations, since they solve different problem sets. Could you maybe ask a different question? -- Terry _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
