> > Are you trying to compile the -stable version of gcc? We make significant > > modifications to integrate it within our environment. I would not at all > > be suprised if the -stable version of gcc doesn't build on -current. ... > > You are aware that there are gcc ports set up to configure the FSF trees > > specifically for use on FreeBSD, right? And that includes gcc-2.95.4. ... On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 08:57:35PM -0800, Rhett Monteg Hollander wrote: > Well, I was able to build it on -CURRENT, along with binutils > and other fine software from -STABLE tree. The reason was that > in several cases GCC 3.2.1 proved to be significantly slower > than 2.95.4 (I mean regular integer\floating-point operations, > MMX\SSE\3DNow! is a whole different story). I replaced 3.2.1 > with 2.95.4, and since I did so in very brute way, latter had > no clue where system includes are, and ld had amnesia too
You really, really want to just use the /usr/ports/lang/gcc295 port. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
