On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 01:25:24AM -0500, Jeff Roberson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm using SCHED_ULE on my laptop now. My recent round of fixes seems to
> have helped out. I'm getting good interactive performance. I'm doing the
> following:
>
> nice -5'd for (;;) {} process.
> make -j4 buildworld
>
> Mozilla, pine, irc, screen, vi, etc.
>
> All interactive tasks are very responsive. My nice -5'd looping process
> is getting 70% of the cpu and my compile is taking the rest. nice +20 may
> not behave as well as in sched_4bsd right now. I'm going to work on that.
>
> This is on a 2ghz laptop though so your mileage may vary. Use reports are
> welcome.
Much improved, can work while two [EMAIL PROTECTED] processes run at nice
19. Still takes more time to show directory listing (ls -la) compared
to scheduler and the listing itself is a bit "jumpy". Scrolls about
20 lines, then waits for a moment, then scrolls forward again and so
on. The stopping moments are actually very short, but noticeable.
This is while the seti's are running, 2CPU PIII-500.
--
Vallo Kallaste
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
