Brooks Davis (Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 11:00:11AM -0800) wrote: > On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 01:38:54PM -0500, Hiten Pandya wrote: > > To conclude, I would like to see the loopback device made default, and > > if this is not agreed upon, then someone needs to fix case when loopback > > device is not in the kernel config, and is going to be loaded as a > > module. > > What is gained by making loopback default? It's true that you need a > loopback device, but that's a bug not a feature.
Right, I do not have a problem with that, but that just means someone needs to fix that in netinet/if_ether.c, and netinet/igmp.c. -- Hiten Pandya ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.unixdaemons.com/~hiten/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
