Terry Lambert (Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 04:15:11AM -0800) wrote: > Tony Finch wrote: > > The details might be different but not > > enough to confuse a competent programmer. > > Same argument, in favor of the netns code. > > It's a moot point anyway, I just fixed netns.
Sorry to but in, but I don't see why this so called bikesheed keeps getting bigger and bigger. The outcome is simple. If your patches function properly, then there is no need to remove netns provided you don't mind maintaining it. If it doesn't have a maintainer, then just apply your fixes and shuv it in the Attic so it's less horid when someone wants to restart the effort of maintaining it. Not that I can do anything about it, but I can't see why this discussion is getting bigger and bigger for no reason. Cheers. PS. Just my 2 cents. -- Hiten Pandya ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.unixdaemons.com/~hiten/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
