In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Schultz writes: >Just out of curiosity, is your agenda to convince everyone to nix >386 support altogether or to fix 386 support? I'm not against >either, although I consider the latter goal to be a bit silly.
My agenda is to find some data either in support of or disproving a theory I have about a timing related issue. I realize that we may instead end up with some entirely different data which proves that we should not carry 386[sd]x support forward in RELENG_5. If so I can live with that, I'll have to find another way to find "my" datapoints then. I also don't think we should even think about redecorating this particular bikeshed at this time. If two weeks from now nobody has managed to get -current on a genuine 386[sd]x CPU, then we have a new data point which might merit discussion. Right we would just have the usual arm-chair generals and pundits pounding their pulpits. Poul-Henning -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
