Matthew Emmerton wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> > of course..
> >
> > New functionality vs POLA. An age old conflict.
> 
> Isn't POLA the reason why people gave up trying to extend the old standards
> (like syslogd and inetd) and decided to build new feature-rich daemons like
> msyslog and xinetd?


People apparently keep confusing "POLA" with "PONA" -- the "Principle
Of No Astonishment".

The purpose of POLA is to suppress unnecessary changes, not suppress
necessary changes.


-- Terry

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to