Vallo Kallaste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll second Brad's statement about vinum and softupdates
> interactions. My last experiments with vinum were more than half a
> year ago, but I guess it still holds. BTW, the interactions showed
> up _only_ on R5 volumes. I had 6 disk (SCSI) R5 volume in Compaq
> Proliant 3000 and the system was very stable before I enabled
> softupdates.. and of course after I disabled softupdates. In between
> there were crashes and nasty problems with filesystem. Unfortunately
> it was production system and I hadn't chanche to play.
Did you believe that the crashes were caused by enabling softupdates on
an R5 vinum volume, or were the crashes unrelated to vinum/softupdates?
I can see how crashes unrelated to vinum/softupdates might trash vinum
filesystems.
--
Darryl Okahata
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DISCLAIMER: this message is the author's personal opinion and does not
constitute the support, opinion, or policy of Agilent Technologies, or
of the little green men that have been following him all day.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
