* De: "Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-02-16 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: OPIE breakage: backout & patch for review ]
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 19:11:49 +0000, Mark Murray wrote:
> >
> > In the case where an application is OPIEised and not PAMised, we
> > need to figure out something; PAMizing such apps is not terribly
> > hard. If any of them are in the base system, then this situation
>
> We are not in the situation to force users and admins to rewrite their
> OPIE apps under new PAM framework. I always believe that non-destructive
> for OPIE defaults (i.e. PAM only) solution is possible here, but not
> being PAM specialist, can't demonstrate it. Recent des commits solve
> problem correctly.
Can you explain how this stops purely opieized apps from working? I was
under the impression the implicit case was still there, we just have a
more explicit contract with the OPIE system.
--
Juli Mallett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - AIM: BSDFlata -- IRC: juli on EFnet
OpenDarwin, Mono, FreeBSD Developer - ircd-hybrid Developer, EFnet addict
FreeBSD on MIPS-Anything on FreeBSD - Never trust an ELF, COFF or Mach-O!
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
