"Jacques A. Vidrine" wrote: > > Apparently, there was a bug fixed in 4.7 -> 5.0, where the > > effective UID was being tested instead of the real UID. > > > > This is probably something that someone should MFC. > > Really? I just took a quick look at this, but I have to shove off > for now. In initial tests, I get the different results depending on > whether I'm using static or dynamic linking. But maybe it's me, I'll > look more carefully later. > > How about pointing out the bug you found?
Hand me the pointy hat. The "bug" was that my test program seperated the operation into a function so I could try different crap, and adding the setuid(geteuid()) put a zero on the stack in the stack position Mike discovered was being used uninitialized. Really bizarre. Shouldn't compiling that stdio code have cause a warning?!? Is optimization disabled for the stdio code?!? -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
