In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Andrey A. Chernov" writes:
>
>--SUOF0GtieIMvvwua
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Disposition: inline
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 01:11:06 -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>>=20
>> Another problem (noticed by tjr) is that once the sequence hits '0' it
>> jumps to INT_MAX and stays there forever.  For example, seeding with
>> srand(0) produces nothing but INT_MAX from rand().
>>=20
>> It looks like a lot more validation of this PRNG is needed.
>
>Don't have an idea about this thing yet, maybe some sign or variable size=
>=20
>change fix required.
>
>BTW, note that new formulae also used in the kernel (by BSD developers)
>and taken from there - libkern/random.c - so all you say is true there
>too.

It should be nuked from the kernel, and arc4random() used instead.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED]         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to