On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 11:56:59PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote: > * De: Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-28 ] > [ Subjecte: Re: Patch to teach config(8) about "platforms". ] > > You see how the current approach affects other architectures if you > > look at the diff for src/sys/conf/kmod.mk. All architectures, > > including those that don't have multiple variants will have a link > > added that mirrors the machine link. I find that aestheticly > > displeasing. If you have the variants under <machine>, you don't > > have to create more links. > > Only within the kernel build directory. That's at Peter's request. > Doing it for the installed version breaks mkioctl.
But not doing it makes the installed version rather useless on mips and powerpc, doesn't it? I mean, not having the links to the platform directory when headers in the machine directory depend on it? Or am I missing the purpose of the installed bsd.kmod.mk? > > The same happens in config(8) where we create a platform link > > in all cases, not just for powerpc and mips. > > See the comment for kmod.mk. It doesn't affect anything. It > can be changed, if you like. It depends. If we opt for a platform directory in all case, we might as well have the link in all cases. I don't like it, but won't actually wake up every morning and go look for it in an attempt to make my SM life more enjoyable :-) -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message