I would recomend 4.7 for a production machine. Until 5.0 is -STABLE I
wouldn't use it for anything as mission-critical as a Mail server.

Adam

----- Original Message -----
From: "Forrest W. Christian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 12:25 AM
Subject: 5.0 SMP status.


>
> I've got a Intel-motherboard-based SMP box I'm going to be using as a
> fairly heavily loaded mail server.  I've currently got 4-Stable on it, but
> for various reasons I need to blow the installation away and start over.
>
> I'm currently wavering between putting 4.x or 5.x on it.  I'd like to put
> 5.x on it since I will have some time (month or so) to stabilize it before
> it really goes into production.  On the other hand, I'm seeing notes in
> various that indicate that the SMP subsystem might not be nearly stable
> enough for anything even resembling production work.
>
> So I guess my question really is something along the lines of "What is the
> consensus on the stablility of 5.x in an SMP environment?" or "Other than
> the newness and lack of real world experience with 5.x is there any other
> compelling reasons why I shouldn't be putting 5.x on this box?"
>
> - Forrest W. Christian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) AC7DE
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> The Innovation Machine Ltd.                              P.O. Box 5749
> http://www.imach.com/                                Helena, MT  59604
> Home of PacketFlux Technologies and BackupDNS.com       (406)-442-6648
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>       Protect your personal freedoms - visit http://www.lp.org/
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
>


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to