On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 07:24:02PM +0200, Vallo Kallaste wrote: > On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 10:26:24PM -0500, Alexander Kabaev > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Fri, 6 Dec 2002 23:26:52 +0200 > > Vallo Kallaste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I've built it yesterday together with a lots of other stuff. Using > > > other -march values than i686 is unofficially claimed to be > > > unsupported (kan@freebsd). As others I'll bet the -march=p4 is > > > causing problems, i686 works for me. > > > > The only thing I "claimed" was that using -march=p4 and other options > > which imply SSE2 with gcc 3.2.x is asking for trouble. Judging by the > > number of bugfixes that were committed to GCC mainline for SSE2 related > > problems, I am not that far off base. AFAIK, none of those bugfixes made > > it back to GCC 3.2.x branch. > > Ok, this is a good claim and making it public will be even better. > The p4 optimisation is known to be problematic and users should be > notified before they'll shoot the foot off. IMO it will be a good > idea to add some logic into appropriate global makefile, to notify > users. It's long time problem now and comes up periodically in the > lists.
Perhaps it should be mentioned in the relnotes/errata. Kris
msg48336/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
