On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 03:17:24AM -0800, Maxime Henrion wrote: > Juli Mallett wrote: > > * De: Maxime Henrion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-11-05 ] > > [ Subjecte: Re: uuid.h is not C++ safe ] > > > Maxime Henrion wrote: > > > > Patrick Hartling wrote: > > > > > I was just about to put the new DCE 1.1 UUID functions into use in some > > > > > C++ code, but linking fails because the function prototypes in uuid.h > > > > > are not protected with the __cplusplus/extern "C" bits. It's easy > > > > > enough for me to fix my local copy, but I'm sure this same thing could > > > > > trip up other people. > > > > > > > > This should be fixed with the attached patch. Marcel, can you review > > > > and commit it please ? > > > > Oops, I probably should have pinged Marcel about this, now that I think > > about it, but anyway, it shouldn't change anything. Even with vanilla > > cpp(1) both produce the right thing, with or without __cplusplus defined, > > and both produce the identical thing (moins linenos/whitespace) in the > > C case. > > > > Of course, both <uuid.h> and <sys/uuid.h> needed changed, as both > > define protos, and <sys/uuid.h> is included into <uuid.h>. > > That's arguably bad, sys/uuid.h shouldn't have any !_KERNEL prototypes > in it.
If there's a better place, then we should move it. We could put it in <uuid.h>, but I don't want to make that header a requirement if one only uses the syscall. I don't yet know what a good place would be, if not <sys/uuid.h>. Suggestions? -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
