On Thu, 31 Oct 2002 05:45:43 -0800
Juli Mallett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * De: David O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-10-31 ]
> [ Subjecte: Re: [PATCH: libc]Re: gnome on current ]
> > On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 06:02:38PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
> > > Considering that I built the same applications and ran the same
> > > applications fine a while ago, and we've had a binutils upgrade,
> > > and things don't break on other systems, I'm inclined to assume
> > > there are linker bugs afoot, and all the other speculative stuff
> > > seems to be based on misunderstandings or bad information.
> >
> > Huh? Your statement is rather speculative stuff. Other systems
> > (say Linux) are using the same linker we are. Please speculate
> > less. Please grab an older ld and try to prove your speculation.
>
> It's deductive. Other systems are using similar library setups, in
> terms of weak vs. strong systems,
Wrong. Solaris and Linux differ from FreeBSD each in its own way.
Linux provides strong pthread definitions in libpthread
Solaris provides weak pthread and _pthread definitions in Libc
with libpthread providing strong _pthread and weak pthread
We are the weird one it seems.
--
Alexander Kabaev
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
