On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 05:17:44PM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
> Are you using UFS1 extended attributes on that box?

Yes.
(290) smkelly@edgemaster:~$ grep UFS /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/EDGEMASTER
options         UFS_DIRHASH
options         UFS_EXTATTR
options         UFS_EXTATTR_AUTOSTART
options         UFS_ACL

> I suspect there might
> be a bug involving the open flags passed to extended attribute backing
> vnodes such that a remount is refused because there are existing vnodes
> opened writable.  I.e., the extended attribute backing files are opened
> FREAD|FWRITE, and since the file system is mounted read-only, remount
> refuses to upgrade to a rw mount until they are closed.  My guess is that,
> in fact, this should be permitted, or we should re-open the backing files
> on a remount.  I'd like to get this bug fixed, but it is another reason to
> recommend UFS2 over UFS1.

That would make sense. I had never considered the backing files being the
cause of it. If necessary, I can rebuild my kernel without ACLs and
EXTATTRs to see if that cures the problem.

I haven't switched to UFS2 for a few reasons:
* I don't know what state it is in (can I boot from it on x86?)
* I don't know how stable it is now
* I don't really want to have to go through the hassle of backing up and
  restoring all my data right now. Oh what I'd give for a conversion tool.
  Hello? Partition Magic people? *shakes wallet*

-- 
Sean Kelly         | PGP KeyID: 77042C7B
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.zombie.org

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to