Ruslan Ermilov writes:
 > OK, to summarize things.  There was a single problem with two
 > symptoms: 1) groff, if built dynamically, could not be run
 > by ld-elf.so; 2) groff, if built statically, always failed
 > with ``out of memory'', apparently due to the same bug.
 > 
 > Static hack is safe to delete because:
 > 
 > 1.  groff that is built as part of the bootstrap-tools during
 >     buildworld will be built static anyway (see -DNOSHARED in
 >     BMAKE in Makefile.inc1)
 > 
 > 2.  if you have a vulnerable kernel and rtld-elf, static
 >     linkage does not address the problem -- you get spurious
 >     ``out of memory'' even if you link groff statically.
 > 
 > If you agree, please feel free to commit the backout of
 > the hack yourself -- I'm going to leave the computer now.  :-)

Removed.  

Please review the following UPDATING entry:

--- UPDATING    3 Sep 2002 06:13:43 -0000       1.217
+++ UPDATING    23 Oct 2002 21:24:44 -0000
@@ -22,6 +22,19 @@
        integrity.  Re-enabling write caching can substantially
improve
        performance.

+20021023:
+       Alphas with kernels from between 20020902 and 20021022 and/or
+       rtld (ld-elf.so.1) older than 20021022 may experience problems
+       with groff while doing a buildworld (kernel: "out of memory",
+       rtld: "too few PT_LOAD segments").
+
+       So, to successfully upgrade your Alpha, you must either
+       upgrade your kernel and rtld first (which might be a bit
+       tricky), or avoid running the bootstrapped groff during the
+       "transitional" buildworld.  To avoid running groff during the
+       transitional upgrade run make buildworld with -DNOMAN,
+       -DNO_SHAREDOCS, and -DNO_LPR.
+
 20020831:
        gcc has been upgraded to 3.2.  It is not all binary compatible
        with earlier versions of gcc for c++ programs.  All c++


Note:  I have NOT tested this, beyond verifying that a kernel from Sep
02 works fine.

Thanks,

Drew

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to