On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Joe Marcus Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 23:38, M. Warner Losh wrote: > : > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > : > Joe Marcus Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : > : On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 23:22, M. Warner Losh wrote: > : > : > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > : > : > Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : > : > : Is it statically linked? > : > : > > : > : > Yup. > : > : > : > : You'll need to rebuild against the new libc_r, then. > : > > : > Yuck. I'd rather nail jello to a tree than try to update a port that > : > complicated. > : > : If it makes you feel better, I just ran a compile on my -CURRENT > : machine, and it went fine. Both mozilla and mozilla-devel should build > : out of the tree....with or without jello. > > Do you know if this breaks libc_r.so.4.0 too? I'm thinking of just > grabbing the build from Mozilla.org...
I think it does since it's a kernel ABI breakage in ucontext_t's and sigreturn(). I think we either need to reformat the ucontext_t in some way that is compatible with the old format, or make a new sigreturn() using the current one for compatibility. It's a shame 'cause it's only broken for i386, not the other archs. -- Dan Eischen To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
