On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 11:11:15PM +0200, Mark Santcroos wrote: > I worked around this by making the driver a child of pci instead of a > child of acpi. (Which is even more correct too)
My driver is a child of acpi again and at this point it always seems to be called at resume too. I don't know whether that is due to the latest acpi patches (29/8) or other changes in the kernel. (At this point I don't want to spent time tracking that down) > However, getting my screen back doesn't work yet. So there might be more > too it. (In the worst case, the 'OFF' I do, is different than the 'OFF' > the system does, so doing my 'ON' doesn't influence the systems 'OFF') It turned out to be the 'worst case'. The 'OFF' I was doing is not the same 'OFF' as the system itself is doing. (Actually my OFF was a display switch from one to another without going to the other actually. It was a wild guess and turned to be wrong) Do you think that there is a change that this is in the direction of DPMS, or is that very unliky? I tried to find the spec for DPMS but it seems to be a closed on (at least to non-members). I'm back to where I started basicly (besides knowing more about acpi now). Mark -- Mark Santcroos RIPE Network Coordination Centre http://www.ripe.net/home/mark/ New Projects Group/TTM To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message