On Sun, 1 Sep 2002, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 02:34:12PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote:
> > So, what is it about gcc 3.2 that's so important, considering that we
> > wanted to do a real 5.0 release within 2 months?
>
> This is really 3.1.1 -- so it is a minor point release. 3.2 fixes a bug
> that changes the API so it couldn't be fixed in 3.1.1. Otherwise they
> are the same compilers.
>
> That said, we don't want to be stuck with a stale compiler for all of
> 5.x. I highly recomend we use 3.3 in our 5.0-R.
>
All that's good, but is this on the roadmap of RE && core so that
adequate destabilization time is accounted for?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
