I already tried that this morning, it had no effect ... Unless you would
like me to try an old kernel with it
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
> can you try compiling a new libc_r with th efollowing change suggested by
> Dan Eischen:
>
> ------begin quote:
>
> I also made changes to uthread_sigpending.c and uthread_sigsuspend.c
> 3 days ago (lib/libc_r/uthread/...). You can try reverting those
> changes and go back to revisions 1.18 and 1.11 respectively.
>
> ------end quote..
>
> so that is uthread_sigpending.c version 1.18
> and
> uthread_sigsuspend.c version 1.11
>
> Thanks
>
> Julian
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Wesley Morgan wrote:
>
> > Reverting proc.h and queue.h do nothing. Booting a kernel from 20020624,
> > still crashes all threaded systems. Same behavior on a 20020620 kernel.
> > > I don't change any of those.
> > >
> > > On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I'd suspect that it is something to do with the layout of
> > >> the fpregs, mcontext or something like that. Libc_r mucks
> > >> about in jmp_buf (userland) and ucontext/mcontext, so anything
> > >> that changed those would cause problems.
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > It's still unclear if a KSE kernel works with an old libc_r or visa
> > > versa.
> > >
> > > I'd like to see if a new libc_r works with an old kernel (someone who
> > > can boot kernel.back and test...)
> > >
> > > to check if you have a non KSE kernel,
> > > sysctl kern.threads will only succeed in a new kernel.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
--
_ __ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___
Wesley N Morgan _ __ ___ | _ ) __| \
[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ __ | _ \._ \ |) |
FreeBSD: The Power To Serve _ |___/___/___/
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
