On Tue, 11 Jun 2002 07:29:56 MST, Juli Mallett wrote: > > I don't think you should worry too much about _not_ getting > > reasonable output from POSIX-conformant utilities. :-) > > I'd read SUS's ps(1) escription a little closer. Very few guarantees > with it. My POSIX.2 (1993) suggests that you can get a sufficient level of regularity out of ps(1) to provide reliable input for a tree printer. I think the "5.23.6.1 Standard Output" section defines the impact of the format specified with the -o option "well enough". I haven't looked at what SUS has to say about the issue, but if it's more ambiguous, then it's a regression from POSIX.2 (1993) and should be corrected. :-) Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: Looking for comments on a new utility... Juli Mallett
- Re: Looking for comments on a new utility..... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: Looking for comments on a new utili... Julian Elischer
- Re: Looking for comments on a new u... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: Looking for comments on a new utility... Sheldon Hearn
- Re: Looking for comments on a new utility... Juli Mallett
- Re: Looking for comments on a new utility..... Andrew Kenneth Milton
- Re: Looking for comments on a new utili... Juli Mallett
- Re: Looking for comments on a new u... Sheldon Hearn
- Re: Looking for comments on a ... Juli Mallett
- Re: Looking for comments o... Sheldon Hearn
- Re: Looking for comments on a new u... Terry Lambert
- Re: Looking for comments on a new utility... Cyrille Lefevre
- Re: Looking for comments on a new utility... Hans Lambermont