On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:35:05PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:08:35PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 12:12:16PM -0700, Steven G. Kargl wrote:
> > > -. if ${CPUTYPE} == "k7"
> > > -_CPUCFLAGS = -march=k6 # gcc doesn't support athlon yet, but it will
> > > +. if ${CPUTYPE} == "athlon"
> > > +_CPUCFLAGS = -march=athlon
> >
> > AFAIK the k7 is a valid name for the athlon (marchitecture name).
> > Don't break backwards compatibility here.
>
> Nope. Athlon(tm) is the correct name, just like there really isn't a
> "i586". I just posted a patch for review. Being the originator of
> bsd.cpu.mk, I hope you review it.
So if I have an athlon-xp do I set CPUTYPE to athlon and it handles
everything for me and selects the correct one or athlon-xp?
--
David W. Chapman Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Raintree Network Services, Inc. <www.inethouston.net>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD Committer <www.FreeBSD.org>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
