Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 5 May 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > Yep, these modules don't exist in -STABLE. You should keep your old > > /etc/pam.conf around for -STABLE programs. > I thought that pam ignored pam.conf if /etc/pam.d exists?
-CURRENT's PAM does, -STABLE's doesn't. > Or are > you saying that I should make /etc/pam.d/xdm look just like the old > settings? I'm happy to test ideas to try and make this work, but I don't > really know anything about pam. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message