System Administrator wrote: > > Your message > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Bug in m_split() ? > Sent: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 09:23:16 -0700 > > did not reach the following recipient(s): > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 10 Apr 2002 09:23:21 -0700 > The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did not > report a specific reason. Check the address and try again. If it still > fails, contact your system administrator. > < riffraff.plig.net #5.0.0 X-Postfix; unknown user: > "freebsd-current"> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 10 Apr 2002 09:23:21 -0700 > The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did not > report a specific reason. Check the address and try again. If it still > fails, contact your system administrator. > < riffraff.plig.net #5.0.0 X-Postfix; unknown user: > "freebsd-hackers"> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Reporting-MTA: dns; ex-sj-5.digisle.com > > Final-Recipient: RFC822; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Action: failed > Status: 5.0.0 > X-Supplementary-Info: < riffraff.plig.net #5.0.0 X-Postfix; unknown user: >"freebsd-current"> > X-Display-Name: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Final-Recipient: RFC822; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Action: failed > Status: 5.0.0 > X-Supplementary-Info: < riffraff.plig.net #5.0.0 X-Postfix; unknown user: >"freebsd-hackers"> > X-Display-Name: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hackers,
i'm sorry for the wide distribution, but can anyone, please, review the following patch to m_split() or at least comment on it. i have attached another example that shows my problem. --- uipc_mbuf.c.orig Mon Apr 8 14:40:23 2002 +++ uipc_mbuf.c Mon Apr 8 14:40:43 2002 @@ -584,6 +584,7 @@ if (remain > MHLEN) { /* m can't be the lead packet */ MH_ALIGN(n, 0); + n->m_len = 0; n->m_next = m_split(m, len, wait); if (n->m_next == NULL) { (void) m_free(n); thanks, max
ng_cow.c.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data