On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 06:08:40PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote: > "Crist J. Clark" wrote: > > > This came up in the first place because it's a cross-envrionment > > > issue that needs resolving. The "workaround" exists because the > > > workaround cops out on the cross-environment part of the process > > > and spits out the warnming, instead. > > > > An 'installworld' doesn't even come close to working in a cross > > environment for a whole variety of reasons, so I don't see the > > relevance. > > > > The situation this question comes up is typically 5-CURRENT builds on > > 4-STABLE systems, not in cross-archetecture builds. > > Since this is the recommended upgrade path for going from 4.x > to 5.x right now, it's an issue, if you can't cross-build 5.x > on 4.x.
You can't do it with 4.x .h-files. You need to use 5-CURRENT headers. The cross-tools phase, stage 3, uses the host system's headers. > That other things are broken doesn't really excuse this being > broken. > > The problem is that the kldxref deserves to get its own tools > build, so that there is a version that works against 5.x code > that can be built on 4.x (or NetBSD or Linux or Solaris or > whatever). It builds fine on 4.x as long as you use the correct headers. It appears to run fine on 4.x too. It's just that you pretty much need to add a new stage to the build process. A stage where one builds cross-tools with the new header files. -- Crist J. Clark | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~cjc/ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message