At Sat, 30 Mar 2002 11:02:47 +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Poul-Henning Kamp writes: > >In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Malone writes: > >>On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 09:59:29AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >>> This is an interesting machine: A K6 wiht ACPI, havn't seen that > >>> before. > >> > >>I had one of these machines and concluded that the ACPI time counter > >>was busted. I dunno if it is possible to sanity check the time > >>counter before using it? I just switched to using the TSC early in > >>boot and forgot about it. > > > >That is what I try to do, and I recently rewrote the code in current > >for that exact reason, so I'm very interested in seeing the diagnostic > >output (boot -v) from a -current kernel on these motherboards. > > I've stared at the data file and I'll be damned if I can find anything > which would case the clock to double its speed :-(
Perhaps something else is causing the clock to run twice as fast? Maybe two things that are working properly are both incrementing the clock? > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
