On Wed, 13 Mar 2002 04:13:35 +0100, Emiel Kollof wrote: > Why not test for it like this (or similar): > > [ -x /usr/sbin/kldxref ] && /usr/bin/kldxref (etcetera...) I think the reason this isn't helpful is because it only catches one failure case. The other is where /usr/sbin/kldxref doesn't execute properly, because it relies on features of an as-yet not installed shell, libc, kernel or all three. In such cases, I don't think we should consider the installation of the kernel to have failed. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- 4.5->5.0 kldxref:No such file or directory huntting
- Re: 4.5->5.0 kldxref:No such file or directory Crist J. Clark
- Re: 4.5->5.0 kldxref:No such file or direc... Emiel Kollof
- Re: 4.5->5.0 kldxref:No such file or d... Crist J. Clark
- Re: 4.5->5.0 kldxref:No such file ... Emiel Kollof
- Re: 4.5->5.0 kldxref:No such ... Emiel Kollof
- Re: 4.5->5.0 kldxref:No such file or d... David O'Brien
- Re: 4.5->5.0 kldxref:No such file or d... Sheldon Hearn
- Re: 4.5->5.0 kldxref:No such file or d... Brad Huntting
- Re: 4.5->5.0 kldxref:No such file or d... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: 4.5->5.0 kldxref:No such file ... Lamont Granquist
- RE: 4.5->5.0 New Bootloader needed Jan Stocker
- Re: 4.5->5.0 New Bootloader needed Kyle Butt
- Re: 4.5->5.0 New Bootloader needed Kris Kennaway