I have the UMA patch installed on two systems here, a 500Mhz K7 system and dual PIII SMP box, both of which have WITNESS and INVARIANTS configured in the kernel. I will run them for the next few days, and report anything that looks unusual in operation :)
GG. >I'd like people to test with WITNESS and INVARIANTS, although with these >options on it is somewhat slower than the original kernel. With these >disabled it is on par. If you have a SMP machine you will get witness >warnings if you run low on memory. There is no real problem except that >witness doesn't understand that the condition is safe. > >If you do test this patch, please send me an email so I know how many >people are using this. If you get a lock order violation other than >"acquring duplicate lock of same type" please let me know. If you get a >panic, please give me a stack trace (tr in ddb) and the output of "call >uma_print_stats" in the debugger if that is possible. > >This has been debugged and tested over several months so it is quite >stable for me. Hopefully it will be stable for you too. :-) > >The patch and new files are available at: >http://www.chesapeake.net/~jroberson/uma.tar > >Untar into src/sys and apply the patch. After you rerun config you should >be ready to compile. > >Thanks, >Jeff > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > Glenn Gombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
