:My version of it does less than this. I only use it to help implement
:spinlocks.
You put together infrastructure to deal with pending pci interrupts?
If so, then why not commit it (or at least commit a version #ifdef'd
for the i386 architecture).
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
:Index: kern_switch.c
:===================================================================
:RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/kern/kern_switch.c,v
:retrieving revision 1.20
:diff -u -2 -r1.20 kern_switch.c
:--- kern_switch.c 11 Feb 2002 20:37:51 -0000 1.20
:+++ kern_switch.c 13 Feb 2002 05:34:20 -0000
:@@ -70,14 +70,21 @@
: }
:
:-/* Critical sections that prevent preemption. */
:+/*-
:+ * Critical section handling.
:+ * XXX doesn't belong here.
:+ *
:+ * Entering a critical section only blocks non-fast interrupts.
:+ * critical_enter() is similar to splhigh() in a 2-level spl setup under
:+ * old versions of FreeBSD.
:+ *
:+ * Exiting from all critical sections unblocks non-fast interrupts and runs
:+ * the handlers of any that were blocked. critical_exit() is similar to
:+ * spl(old_level) in a 2-level spl setup under old versions of FreeBSD.
:+ */
: void
: critical_enter(void)
: {
:- struct thread *td;
:
:- td = curthread;
:- if (td->td_critnest == 0)
:- td->td_savecrit = cpu_critical_enter();
:- td->td_critnest++;
:+ curthread->td_critnest++;
: }
:
:@@ -85,12 +92,7 @@
: critical_exit(void)
: {
:- struct thread *td;
:
:- td = curthread;
:- if (td->td_critnest == 1) {
:- td->td_critnest = 0;
:- cpu_critical_exit(td->td_savecrit);
:- } else
:- td->td_critnest--;
:+ if (--curthread->td_critnest == 0 && (ipending | spending) != 0)
:+ unpend();
: }
:
:Bruce
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
