On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 04:18:33PM +0100, Stijn Hoop wrote: > On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 04:12:48PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > I'm working on porting the latest beta release of Subversion, which > > does all that and more, and has much better diff support than > > Perforce. After using Perforce for my PAM work, I've come to the > > conclusion that although it's a big step forward from CVS in one > > direction (change management & branching), it's a big step backward in > > almost every other direction. > > I can't comment on Perforce, but I can add that I liked subversion even > when it wasn't self hosting; it appears promising to say the least. > > As for your port, there already is a /usr/ports/devel/subversion; it points > you to the port skeleton for version r909. Is yours better/different?
i imagine his is more up to date ;-) 909 is a ways back, we're currently up to like rev 1310 or something. the next milestone will be rolled this week, and i'll update the port once it's out. -garrett -- garrett rooney Unix was not designed to stop you from [EMAIL PROTECTED] doing stupid things, because that would http://electricjellyfish.net/ stop you from doing clever things. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
