Warner Losh wrote: > : Shouldn't we just take the Linux/NetBSD information, and > : actually identify the things instead of saying "Unknown", > : instead, and leave them printing to encourage someone the > : messages annoy to do the work? > > I'd guess that's too much work. Maybe someone can prove me wrong with > trivial patches. I think that the correct fix is to deal with the device hints differentially in the "PnP BIOS present" case, per other posts. Would you accept patches against 4.4-RELEASE? I don't run -current these days, since I need my machines to boot reliably and do real work, other than FreeBSD hacking... -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: unknown PNP hardware Warner Losh
- Re: unknown PNP hardware Wilko Bulte
- Re: unknown PNP hardware Warner Losh
- Re: unknown PNP hardware Brad Huntting
- Re: unknown PNP hardware Kazutaka YOKOTA
- Re: unknown PNP hardware Mike Smith
- Re: unknown PNP hardware Terry Lambert
- Re: unknown PNP hardware Mike Smith
- Re: unknown PNP hardware Warner Losh
- Re: unknown PNP hardware Alexander Langer
- Re: unknown PNP hardware Terry Lambert
- Re: unknown PNP hardware Terry Lambert
- Re: unknown PNP hardware Mike Smith
- Re: unknown PNP hardware Warner Losh
- Re: unknown PNP hardware Terry Lambert
- Re: unknown PNP hardware Terry Lambert
- Re: unknown PNP hardware Mike Smith
- Re: unknown PNP hardware Warner Losh
- Re: unknown PNP hardware Brad Huntting
- Re: unknown PNP hardware Mike Smith
- Re: unknown PNP hardware Kazutaka YOKOTA